1
DES
10259
395
产
ized as a "strong case", H.E. adding, "Xr Wood's case is a
"special one meriting special attention." In Mr Secretary Harcourt's despatch No.91 of 6th April 1911, he approved of the Governor's proposal "having regard to the special circum--- *stances of his case" after consideration of his "position "and prospects". The despatch practically repeats the sub- stance of H. E's despatch to which it is a reply, and I have always read its meaning in the same light as I have explained in regard to the Governor's despatch. I have pointed out that the Governor's recommendat ion was based on "personal" grounds existing in 1911, and it would seem that if suffi- cient grounds then existed for granting me the maximum allow- ance of 2120 in the event of no-promotion in the interim,
they must still exist. I hope in that connection that the lapse of time, together with the performance of my duties, may have in the meantime strengthened my "personal" claims, and in support of that atatement I may be allowed to state
instances in which I hope that I may have succeeded in doing
BO.
From September 1912 to September 1913 I was acting as
Assessor of Rates in addition to my own duties, and whilst
doing so it happened to be a period during which several
Eatters of an unusual nature required attention. The col-
lection of material for the preparation of a report on the
fluctuations of rent values in Hong Kong and Kowloon for a
period of ten years, and the reasons for such fluctuations,
involved such time in enquiry and calculations, and was
largely done outside of official hours.
There were numerous minor reports on the same subject
leading up to the chief one, for which H.. Sir Henry May
was pleased to personally thank me. In connect ion with the
Tramway Boycott and the ordinance introduced in Council in
6.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.